|
Eastside
Citizens for Responsible Development
ECRD
is dedicated to insuring that growth in our communities is intelligently
planned and executed. Our primary goal is to maintain the quality
of life in our neighborhoods while allowing for reasonable expansion
of supporting infrastructure.
Survey
3/5/03:
We have a new survey
to gauge the interest and preferences of eastsiders regarding the
planning of the 520 bridge expansion. We are asking YOU to
fill it out!!
News
11/24/02:
What now for 520? Here's a summary of what
the current thinking is, and what may be concluded at the December
10 Trans-lake meeting.
11/6/02:
Thanks in part to the efforts of ECRD and Citizens
for Real Transportation Solutions Referendium 51 suffers a resounding
defeat. Seattle Times reports.
9/6/02:
The Trans-Lake Executive Commitee voted
for the second-largest expansion option available, without first
considering the Do No Harm provisions. No guaranteed improvements
to the proposed mitigations (lids, etc.) have been integrated into
the plan, yet some concessions are being discussed.
9/3/02:
ECRD supports the "Do
No Harm" statement, which advocates a reasonable approach
to road building. Already adopted by several community groups and
leaders in Seattle, we agree with its core proposal--that community
impact mitigation be an essential part of the SR-520 planning process.
See our press
release outlining our support.
Be
at the September 5th Trans-Lake
Executive Committee meeting!! We will be unveiling our official
support of the Do No Harm initiative. need your help in getting
the message across that we MUST BE HEARD.
|

520
Expansion:
End Gridlock Now study data shows current 520 expansion plan a
lose/lose proposition
A
traffic study commissioned by Kemper Freeman presents comprehensive
520 expansion as an expensive, ineffective plan.
Blowing
our lids over the quality of urban life
James
Vesely of the Seattle Times comments on how Seattle and Mercer
Island fought for their neighborhoods and won. He says Eastsiders
are entitled to fight the same battle, and "people feel their
voices count for little and there are few powerful institutions
willing to speak for them."
Rush
to Judgement?
In
a Seattle Times editorial Paul Dimitriades and Jonathan Dubman
discuss how the current 520 planning puts fast-track execution
ahead of smart planning.
Current
Plan Too Expensive?
Updated
cost estimates indicate current plans to expand our roadways could
cost significantly more than originally thought.
|